About Me

Name:LASER Haas
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Short version on the DOJ cover up of $300 million in Fraud

The Delaware Dept of Justice refuses to prosecute, investigate or, for that matter, even name the bad faith acts of the MNAT law firm as if such were a cardinal sin.
 
It is a fact that the MNAT and TBF law firms both confessed to deceiving the Court and submitting, multiple, false, affidavits to the Federal Court as Officers of the Court.
 
TBF received a Motion to Disgorge for $1.6 million and then was provided a Stipulation to Settle that gifted them Illegal, implied, blanket, immunity. 
 
Now the Delaware Dept of Justice is an Appellee with MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold in the 3rd Circuit Court case 07-2360 as the Dept of Justice egregiously petitions the Court, with taxpayer dollars to throw out eToys shareholders, tossing the whistle blower as the DOJ falsely states that the appeal has no merit.
 
The Dept of Justice even states in a footnote that if will not address any MNAT issues, that is simply absurd as MNAT cross appealed the case and the District Court combined the cases.
 
Think these matters do not harm you, they are in Goldman Sachs, Levitz, Finova, Kmart, Enron, Jumbo Sports, Gadzook, Stage Stores, Toys R Us, Sears, JoAnn's, etc etc.,
 
They go from one Public entity to another and then place the entity into bankruptcy with designed controls to devour the entity from all sides. Going from one entity to another, walking it into Bankruptcy violates most State laws, Federal and even SarOx.
 
The entity eToys went public in 1999 for $8bn and bankrupt March 2001.
 
Where did the money go?
 
And what happened to the standard investigations by the SEC, FBI and Dept of Justice.
 
Since then more than $300 million in fraud and thirty four acts of perjury are documented.
 
The law firms of MNAT and TBF, being "caught" with red-handed, confessed that they filed the false affidavits and deceived the court offering cheeky excuses of inadvertent neglect.
 
 The Asst US Trustee, Frank Perch, documented that the acts were deliberate, premeditated and intentionally left to stand as false.
 
Then Perch Motioned to Disgorge the TBF law firm for $1.6 million and testified therein, that he had forewarned the parties not to violate the law.
 
Less than ten (10) days later the Dept of Justice Trial attorney, Mark Kenney, provided illegal, implied, blanket, immunity to the TBF law firm.
 
Speciously, despite the fact that the MNAT law firm also confessed to filing the false affidavits and also admitted to deceiving the court, the Delaware Dept of Justice does not even mention the MNAT law firms name or acts in any briefs.
 
It has since been discovered that the US Attorney in Delaware, Colm F Connolly, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, when the fraud and perjury began.
 
This is a serious ethics and protocol violation that will most likely hold up the nomination of Colm Connolly from becoming a Delaware District Court Federal Justice.
 
The Delaware Dept of Justice is persistently using taxpayer dollars, defending the right to give theillegal, implied, blanket, immunity, acting as an appellee attorney defending MNAT and TBF while asking the courts to strike and expunge Haas and the shareholders, along with striking and expunging all pleadings that document the perjury and fraud.
 
Additional crimes of perjury and fraud continue, such as the $100 million cash fraud issue in the KB case and the $800 million lawsuit in the NY Supreme Ct. Yet the Dept of Justice simply refuses to do anything about the mendacity.
 
The proof is overwhelming and the number of felony violations is over 100, including Bribery, Fraud, Perjury, Intimidation of Victim/ Witness, Failure to disclose an assets, Collusion to Defraud and Estate and quite possibly RICO.
 
Yet not one single investigation is occurring into the 34 acts of  perjury and over $300 million in fraud.
 
WHY?
 
You can look at the post(s) below for the proof of these acts.
 
If a person cares about the integrity of the system of justice, the acts of mendacity of the law firms, being directly competitive with the Dept of Justice overt efforts to obstruct will boggle your mind~
 
Yes, it is "our" case
 
However
 
IT IS EVERYONE"S SYSTEM OF JUSTICE AT STAKE HERE!
 
Upon finding, proof positive, upon the Dept of Justice Office of Legal Policy (USDOJ OLP) website that Colm Connolly, by his own resume, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, we filed an Official Complaint with the CA US Attorney Tom O'Brien.
 
We received no response from O'Brien's office, however, the Los Angeles Times reports that he walked into a regular meeting, belittled his staff for not finding and prosecuting enough cases
 
(HELLO - Mr O'Brien, 100 cases for prosecution all you have to do is look here)
 
Then, O'Brien summarily disbanded the Public Corruption Unit.
 
US Attorney O'Brien also felt it necessary to threaten career prosecutors to keep their mouths shut and not to discuss any reason for the dismantling with the Press.
 
We called Asst US Attorney's, they spoke with the FBI, the FBI called us, the SEC emailed us, we talked to agents east and west coast, the Region 3 US Trustee has resigned and the FBI even raided the OSC"s home and office, seizing his computer/ files for destroying whistle blower cases against Government personnel.
 
One would then think that they case is going to be solved - correct?
 
Then why did the Dept of Justice send in the removed Roberta DeAngelis, as Acting US Trustee, to the very Region 3 Office over Delaware when DeAngelis is one of the parties, as an appellee, defending the Illegal immunity deal?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Law Professors, Senators' and Judges document DOJ bad faith

It is necessary to document the amount of skulduggery that is readily apparent to Congress and the Courts by providing authoritative commentary that is now becoming profuse throughout the land.
 
Any additional information others may have on the subject is welcomed.
 
 
Many distinguished parties are making remarks about the odd ways the Court's, the Dept of Justice are behaving, especially concerning cases in Delaware.
 
The WSJ Law Blog did a piece on the issue of Delaware's Corp dominance issues  ( here )
 
ProPublic.org speaks of issues that seek to protect the Dept of Justice high up personnel being contrary to the new law that was designed to increase the scrutiny and accountability of our governmental entities, except of course, for the dear ole DOJ
 
The Book by UCLA Law Professor Lynn LoPucki on Courting Failure
How Competition for Big Cases is Corrupting our Bankruptcy Courts, is an authority's look at the corruptive influece of our courts becoming a commerical enterprise.
 
Senator John Cornyn of Texas battled about the LoPucki book with Delaware Senator Biden.
 
    Senator Biden is, of course, conflicted, as Delaware gets a large part of their annual budget from other state corporations paying Delaware taxes.
 

    As Senator Cronyn’s motivation(s) are the pursuits of each State keeping its own revenue and all courts remaining free from temptation to “court”; it is readily apparent what logic should prevail in a “chaste” world.

            Senator Cornyn stated, in a diplomatic manner in an issue of the Legal Times  ( here ),

             “Of course, no one wants to believe that a federal judge would ever distort the law for any reason, let alone in order to improve the court’s docket”. 

            At the same time the Senator stated in the Legal Times, (June 6, 2005), article that the facts are what they are; as Senator Cornyn remarked;

            “After all, picking a judge isn’t far from picking the verdict. What’s more, if debtor’s get to pick the jurisdiction, then bankruptcy courts have a disturbing incentive to compete with each other for major bankruptcy cases, by tilting their rulings in favor of corporate debtors and their attorneys.”
 
 
 
The 3rd Circuit Court of appeals, remarked that there is organized, sophisticated, bad faith behavior by attorney's is detrimental to the integrity of the system. This is due to the organized element now known as "Bankrutpcy Rings"
 

            The 3rd Circuit addressed the issues of “bankruptcy rings”. In the matter of In re Arkansas Co., 798 F.2d 645 (3rd Cir. 08/13/1986), the Circuit remarked upon the fabric of the stabs to clean up errant efforts, after the fact, to circumvent the Code, by quoting the verity that Congress was well aware of the “reality” of how the system “truly” works. The Third Circuit tackled the issues of offensive applications by faulty § 327(a) and Rule 2014 affidavits as follows;

            “It is significant that Congress chose to place the requirement of court approval for the employment of an attorney, accountant, or other professional by the creditors committee directly in the Bankruptcy Code in 1978. 11 U.S.C. § 1103(a). The legislative history makes clear that the 1978 Code was designed to eliminate the abuses and detrimental practices that had been found to prevail. Among such practices was the cronyism of the "bankruptcy ring" and attorney control of bankruptcy cases.

 

            The 3rd Circuit also noted the Congressional awareness of the harsh reality of perpetual malfeasance by attorneys as the Circuit continued on Arkansas stating;

 

    In fact, the House Report noted that "in practice . . . the bankruptcy system operates more for the benefit of attorneys than for the benefit of creditors." H.R. No. 595, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 92, reprinted in 1978 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 5963, 6053”
 
----------------------------------------------
 
In these modern days of Perjury prosecutions of Martha, Bonds, etc for making a false statement to an officer,,,,, how much more heinous will the public find the proof, by an authority that attorney's are lying under oath and getting millions in fees (that they are not entitled to if they tell the truth) and the "police" the Dept of Justice, utilize their power to protect the perpetrators of false hood and deception?
 
There are more than 100 felony violations in the eToys case. The law firms of MNAT and TBF have confessed to filing more than 34 false affidavits and deceiving the court.
 
Where are the prosecutions?
 
Where are the investigations?
 
The Delaware Dept of Justice refuses to even mention the name of the MNAT law firm in any briefings, much less mention their bad faith acts.
 
This problem is not just eToys alone, as you can see by the following;
 
A Dept of Justice Trial Attorney for the US Trustee Program went before Congress and stated that Director Friedman and Director White have done little to promote the Integrity of the US Trustee Program  ( here )
 
Judge Judith Fitzgerald stated that Justice Dept silence aided fraud  ( here ) (you will need to pan down to the W R Grace Tersigni issues and case where Judge Fitzgerald is shocked when the US Trustee representative says he was instructed not to tell the court anything. ( the story is also here )
 
Another Judge reported to House Judiciary Committee that the US Trustee Program is not a "watchdog" , that it is a "pack of dogs" ( here ) Judge Cristol also remarked that it is not David v Goliath it is Goliath versus and ant.
 
A Judge in Michigan dealt with a case, like eToys, where all the previous judges and US Trustee refused to address Fraud on the Court issues.  All previous court decisions in Matrix refused to have a hearing on fraud and the Judge remarked " The Courts have the inherent authority, and indeed a duty, to address fraud on the court issues"  (case item attached as a file).
 
The Courts have also dealt with eToys where the case of In re Baron's used the eToys case to reopen a closed case due to Fraud on the Court. (Florida In re Baron's and Meryl Lanson here ) ( when at the site do the keyword search for eToys, the Court states it agrees with the eToys decision that fraud on the court merits an extended time review.
 
Both the Delaware Dept of Justice and the Delaware Court has stated, despite the confessions to filing 34 false affidavits, that no perjury was documented. In Delaware, supplying a false affidavit is no big deal. (please see judge Walrath's Opinion page 52  here )
 
The 11th Circuit dealt with an issue where a Trustee tried to state that a false affidavit was not perjury if given voluntarily, the Judge in that case said such logic was absurd, "Lying under oath is lying under oath"  ( here )
 
If you file bankruptcy and hide aunt Martha's gift of her great grandmothers ring you can go to jail for 4 or 5 years.
 
If you are an attorney, who becomes an Officer of the Court and steals a public entity to sell it to your regular clients,
you just pay a itsy bitsy fine and can even retaliate and punish the person who blew the whistle on you.
 
Throwing away the shareholders of a public company by planting your paid associate is just a perk a court appointed counsel can enjoy, especially when one of the law firms has a former partner who is the United States Attorney
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Timeline of events of DOJ Cover Up and failure to investigate

The entity eToys went public in 1999 for $8bn and then bankrupt March 2001.
To date, there are no reports of any SEC, FBI or Dept of Justice investigation into this classic "pump n dump" and the real question of where did the money go?
 
Compounding those questions is the speciousness of how the SEC and other investigative parties sat still when the Debtor eToys, represented by the Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel ("MNAT") law firm petitioned the Delaware Bankruptcy Court for the strange request to Destroy Books n Records.
 
Of the many parties that failed to object to this arcane request there is the Creditors, represented by the Traub Bonacquist & Fox ("TBF") law firm and the policing entity of the bankruptcy court, the Dept of Justice United States Trustee's.
 
As it was obvious to anyone, that the request was an effort to destroy evidence, onc can only speculate as to what the motivations were for the lack of response, however, armed with the Court's approve of the esoteric Order, the Senior Executives summarily abandoned the eToys estate providing a feast of plenty to the attorneys' who were left with a cookie jar, milk, the keys and no one to say no!
 
Initially an auction was scheduled to liquidate the entire estate of eToys for $5 million.  The Creditors were alarmed about such a paltry result and sought the counsel of someone who could effect a better result. They settled upon Laser Steven Haas who had just received a significant result in another liquidation of 50% of value.
 
The attorneys TBF & MNAT negotiated that Haas would not be hired as a Professional Person, rather, Haas would utilize his company CLI and the attorney's would then also discouraged Haas from obtaining his own counsel, that the estate would have to pay for. Under the guise that it would save the estate expense, MNAT & TBF would supply the paperwork for CLI to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court instead of Haas doing so himself.
 
Despite the fact that Haas was extensively successful in his efforts and assisted in building the cash deposits of eToys to nearly $50 million, the TBF and MNAT law firms persistently found fault with everything that Haas and his company accomplished. One of the biggest critics at the end of 2001, of Haas, was the new President and CEO of eToys, Mr. Barry Gold and his secretary of sorts, Ellen Gordon from Xroads LLC (the court approved Financial Consultant responsible for accounting for eToys cash deposits).
 
Haas had pulled Barry Gold aside, when he came on board in May 2001 and remarked to Barry Gold that he was concerned that the TBF law firm had hidden agenda's and that Xroads LLC, Ellen Gordon and Paul Traub may be hiding additional items from all interested parties.
 
Haas did not know at the time, that Paul Traub and Barry Gold had been partners for some time.
Mr. Haas had discovered that there were overseas cash deposits, in the millions, that was not reported to the Courts. (The very failure to declare a cash asset on the bankruptcy filing schedules is fraud and a felony violation). When Haas reported this issue to the Creditors and the Creditors attorney,  instead of being thanked for the discovery, TBF again harangued and berated the efforts.
 
Of the many greater returns that Haas and his company had achieved was the sale of the eToys.com name for $10 million.  Inexplicably, MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold renegotiated that sale down to a purported $3 million.
 
Haas's company's commission and success fee's was based upon the actual sale result of the assets to buyers. At the end of 2001, TBF, MNAT and Barry Gold refused to permit Haas review of Books n Records so that a final fee application could be submitted. When it was time to file the final fee applications for CLI and Haas to the Court, MNAT simply refused to do so.
 
Being abandoned but having Court approval for the work, Haas hired another law firm. Haas received one more minor payment with the promise to settle on the balance. However, Haas had a problem, the CLI contracts stated that Haas must file a final fee application by March 2002. As Haas new counsel, Morris James, refused to address the readily apparent conflict of interest issues, Haas got on a plane and went to Delaware and hired a new attorney Henry Heiman. Heiman reported that he was a former Trustee and that the Court approved contracts were irrefutable.  Heiman stated that he would go to court, when the time was right and force compliance with the Court approved contracts.
 
Haas informed the Dept of Justice United States Trustee's office of the many issues at hand, specifically the Dept of Justice trial attorney handling the case, Mark Kenney. The responses from Mr. Kenney were obtuse to the issues at hand as Mr. Kenney reflected that no crimes had occurred and there was no reason to investigate.
 
Then, in a bizarre turn of events, Haas discovered that Barry Gold and TBF were actually associated from as far back as the 1980's, learning this from a former associate of Paul Traub's as the TBF law firm was previously known as Traub Bonacquist & Yellen, before becoming Traub Bonacquist & Fox.  Informing Henry Heiman of this fact resulted in intimidation and extortion acts by the TBF law firm that Henry Heiman actually emailed to Haas.
 
Heiman emailed to Haas that Susan Balaschak of TBF stated that if Haas did not "back off" not only would Haas and his company CLI not get paid, his career would suffer and other retaliations would occur.  Heiman then informed Haas that he should seek other counsel.
 
Haas found other counsels willing to take the case, but Henry Heiman refused to give that new counsel the files of Haas or CLI as Heiman abandoned his duties.
 
Forced to find a way to handle the issues, Haas began to study the Law and Dept of Justice US Trustee website.  At that time Haas learned that the Dept of Justice attorney, Mark Kenney and Henry Heiman had been taking advantage of the fact that Haas was a layman, where they stated no violations of the law had occurred, they were both, in fact, thwarting justice and giving Haas false information.
 
Laser Haas called Mark Kenney and told him of the email threat that was sent to him and how it violated the law. Acting with a little fit of rage, Mark Kenney stated that there was no laws broken and that the issue of Barry Gold and Traub had been handled in the "Bonus Sales" case.  This was the 2nd time the Bonus issued had been mentioned to Haas, however, it was the first time it was mentioned completely by Mark Kenney.
 
Armed with new knowledge of the Law, specifically Sections 101(14) and 327(a), along with the fact that they must be accompanied with a Rule 2014 affidavit, that affirms, "under penalty of perjury" that there are no undisclosed conflicts of interest, Haas looked up the Bonus Sales case on-line with PACER, the Public Access system to Court dockets.
 
As it turns out, Mark Kenney made a "lapse lingue" where such slip of the tongue provided Haas with the first, concrete proof positive, that the Law had been broken and that Perjury in the eToys case was profuse. As a hidden gem within the Bonus Sales bankruptcy case (DE Bankr 03-12284) an affidavit by a company entitled Asset Disposition Advisors LLC ("ADA") existed. On the first sheet of the ADA paperwork on the left side it states Barry Gold Principal and on the right side it states Paul Traub Principal.
 
Haas could not believe his eyes, there it was, concrete proof, irrefutable, as a court docket record, signed by Paul Traub himself, providing proof, beyond all reasonable doubt, that Paul Traub and Barry Gold had an "undisclosed" connection.
 
Further research of the ADA company led to the discovery that it was formed in April 2001. By all testimony before the court and a Hiring Letter not revealed until four (4) years later, Barry Gold became the "wind down coordinator" of eToys in May 2001 and then, after the initial success of the plot, Barry Gold was promoted to the President and CEO of eToys.
 
Both Haas and the eToys shareholders petitioned for an Emergency Hearing to deal with the malicious acts. The Emergency hearing occurred Dec. 22, 2004.  At the same time, with a press release also dated Dec 22 2004, the US Trustee program announced that the new Region 3 Trustee (who presides over Delaware) was Kelly B Stapleton who replaced the Acting US Trustee Roberta DeAngelis.
 
The Bankruptcy Code is designed by Congress to make sure that these type of shenanigans do not occur. That is why, even though attorneys already are governed by Model Rules of Conduct and their oath's before the State Bar's, Congress wanted to make sure that the Creditors and Debtor in bankruptcy cases were "arms length" in all their transactions, in order to assure good faith dealings. This is why Section 327(a), the application of Professional Persons requires that even an attorney must supply a Rule 2014 Affidavit affirming that they are "disinterested" parties as is defined by Section 101(14).
 
Therefore the only way that there can be any "undisclosed" issues of a "conflict of interest" is for an attorney to supply a False Affidavit.
 
Supplying a False Affidavits is an act of Perjury.
 
Doing so intentionally, after being warned not to do an act is extensively egregious.
 
This particular case is made morose because the United States Trustee's office testified, in its Motion to Disgorge the TBF law firm $1.6 million, that the parties had discussions with the US Trustee about replacing key personnel of the Debtor.  The US Trustee states twice in the Disgorge Motion that he instructed the parties Not to replace key personnel of the Debtor with anyone connected to the retained professionals of the estate.
 
Disregarding that authoritative warning, TBF, MNAT and Barry Gold, along with others, drafted the Hiring Letter for Barry Gold. He was given a contractual choice that permitted him to choose, whether or not, to apply to the Court for permission to be hired. This violates the law under pretense and "color of law". After choosing not to apply; Barry Gold was then given $40,000 per month, promoted to President/ CEO and promised a Bonus possibility at the end of the case.
 
Armed with these facts, alarmed that TBF was given immunity, Haas wondered what else was there that was hidden.
 
 Haas and the eToys shareholders looked everywhere for additional acts of malfeasance. Haas then discovered that MNAT, TBF and Barry Gold all had "undisclosed" connections to Bain/ KB. The significance of that is the fact that eToys sold the bulk of the estate assets to Bain/ KB for discounts in the tens of millions of dollars, including the nefarious renegotiation by the parties to reduce the $10 million dollar bid for eToys.com to only $3 million. 
 
This is Collusion to Defraud an estate. As entrusted Officers of the Court, there is no greater crime that the attorneys can commit.
 
The parties were so brazen and flagrantly arrogant in their acts of mendacity, believing that they had gotten away with all the subterfuge - MNAT is actually representing Bain in the KB bankruptcy case.
 
Paul Traub had the unmitigated gall to petition that Court for permission to prosecute the $100 million dollar cash payment that KB paid to Bain and Michael Glazer prior to KB filing for Bankruptcy.
 
 Haas then filed a motion to that Court. Upon reporting this to the Director of the United States Trustee and the Asst US Trustee who Motioned to Disgorge TBF the $1.6 million, both parties resigned.
 
Speciously and quietly (as you will find no press release in 2005 concerning the issue) the removed Roberta DeAngelis was promoted to the post of General Counsel of the US Trustee's office in Washington DC (EOUST GC).
 
Again, Mark Kenney stepped up to the plate and defended the perpetrators of fraud. Being that MNAT and TBF could not answer the Haas allegations and the Chairman of the Creditors Committee affidavits, the Delaware Dept of Justice submitted a Motion to the KB Court asking that Court to strike and expunge the Haas motion with proofs of perjury and fraud.
 
Seeing that it was readily apparent that the "fix" was in, Haas reached out to other governemant agencies such as the SEC, FBI, Public Integrity Section, the OSC, OGE, OIG, Pres Bush Corp Fraud Task Force, the OPR, Administrator of the Courts and even the US Marshall, all of whom referred Haas to the whistle blower entity, the local US Attorney and the General Counsel of the US Trustee's.
 
As anyone can see, though no one knew such at the time, sending any items to the General Counsel's office is a waste of energy, as you would be asking Roberta DeAngelis to prosecute her own failure to perform.
 
It has also been discovered that the US Attorney in Delaware, Colm F Connolly, was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001, the very year the fraud and perjury began (for all we know Connolly worked on the case or with the related clients). 
 
Colm Connolly's failure to investigate or prosecute violates Ethics, Model Rules of Conduct and the protocol of the Dept of Justice that requires him to notify the Public Integrity Section.
 
Therefore we decided to report the case to the CA US Attorney's office where Pres Bush Corp Fraud Task Force was managed and eToys has its' home office in CA.
 
We received no response from the CA US Attorney, whose website states that they will answer in 8 to 12 weeks with an acknowledgement that they are looking into the issue or a decline to go any furhter.
 
However, the Los Angeles Times reported a story that seems to be connected.  The official complaint was filed with the CA US Attorney Dec 7, 2007.  A little over the 12 weeks later, the CA US Attorney walked into a staff meeting and harangued his staff. After berating them he informed them that all personnel working in the Public Corruption Unit would be reassigned.
 
Making the actions appear even more specious is the fact that the L A Times reported a story on March 20, 2008;  that Tom O'Brien, the CA US Attorney went so far as to intimidate career prosecutors threatening to tarnish their reputations if they discussed any reason for the dismantling of the Public Corruption Unit with the Press.
 
Then, a few weeks later, May 2, 2008 the United States Trustee press releases made a note that Kelly B Stapleton, the girl that replaced Roberta DeAngelis, resigned.
 
Speciously and almost expectedly, the very person sent back into the Region 3 Trustee's office to clean up her own mess is the now notorious Roberta DeAngelis.
 
Then, just four days later, the WSJ reported on the fact that the FBI raided the home in Northern Virgina and his office, confiscating computers and files of Scott Bloch in Washington DC.
 
Scott Bloch was the head of the Office of Special Counsel in Washington DC.  Of the many duties the Office of Special Counsel is responsible for, the one germane here is the fact that the OSC's office handles sensitive investigations into Government wrongdoing. This would include Whistle Blower files against government personnel.
 
Things are certainly heating up and the amount of disparaging acts by the current Administrations Dept of Justice seems to know no restraint.
 
Many subpoenas were recently issued by Congress into the political prosecutions that apparently occurred and the firing of those that refused to prosecute such cases.
 
Wonder when the mindset of all will turn on the light bulb about the issue that if they can make prosecutions happen for political purposes, then the next obvious question is what prosecutions, that should have occurred, were buried?
 
We have one such case right here!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »